Chigwell auto supplier banned just after breaching finance agreements

123 Motors Ltd was incorporated in July 2015 and traded as automobile dealership from premises in Bishops Stortford.

Luc William Peeters (47), also acknowledged as Stuart Fallan, was appointed a director of 123 Motors in December 2015 right before the motor vehicle dealership commenced to struggle and in April 2018 entered into a collectors voluntary liquidation.

123 Motors’ liquidation, on the other hand, brought the company to the awareness of the Insolvency Service who executed additional enquiries into numerous circumstances of misconduct.

Investigators proven that the vehicle dealership’s customers could secure cash to invest in cars by external finance businesses 123 Motors experienced working agreements with.

But from at the very least September 2016, Luc Peeters, from Chigwell, Essex, brought about 123 Motors to enter into illegitimate aspect agreements with the very same shoppers.

These more agreements enabled customers to return the new automobile to 123 Motors right after 12 months. The vehicle dealership would promote the automobiles on to other purchasers, leaving the initial customer with no money liability to the finance businesses.

These facet agreements, nevertheless, ended up arranged with out the consent of the finance firms and breached the validity and enforceability of the personal loan agreements in between the shoppers and the finance providers, as perfectly as the terms of the running agreements 123 Motors had with the finance corporations.

The finance companies only turned knowledgeable of what was occurring when clients manufactured grievances immediate to them immediately after 123 Motors experienced failed to adhere to the terms set out in the illegitimate aspect agreements.

One particular of the finance companies terminated its functioning arrangement with 123 Motors in January 2018 and demanded the auto dealership provide £2.3 million in payment to address in opposition to all losses, expenditures, promises and bills incurred owing to the breach of the running agreement.

A couple months afterwards in March 2018, 123 Motors was issued with a second demand from customers by one more finance company to repay just above £42,000 after the motor vehicle dealership breached running agreements with them as nicely.

On 23 September 2020 the Secretary of Condition acknowledged a 9-12 months disqualification undertaking from Luc Peeters following he did not dispute that he brought on 123 Motors to enter into Facet Agreements with customers devoid of the expertise or permission of the providers delivering finance in respect of the autos to which the Side Agreements similar.

Effective from 13 October 2020, Luc Petters is disqualified for 9 a long time from performing as a director or immediately or indirectly turning into included, without having the authorization of the court docket, in the advertising, formation or management of a company.

Martin Gitner, Deputy Head of Insolvent Investigations for the Insolvency Service, reported:

Directors have a obligation to uphold agreements their providers enter into, as perfectly as currently being genuine in their dealings with customers. Regrettably, Luc Peeters failed on both accounts when he failed to expose his true pursuits when he caused 123 Motors’ customers to enter into illegitimate contracts.

A nine-calendar year disqualification is a significant ban and recognises the severity of Luc Peeters’ actions. This should provide as a stark warning to other directors of the challenges they acquire when they do not uphold business and insolvency legislation.

Notes to editors

Luc Peeters is of Chigwell and his day of start is November 1972.

123 Motors Minimal (Corporation Reg no. 9670814)

Disqualification undertakings are the administrative equal of a disqualification get but do not involve court proceedings. People issue to a disqualification purchase are sure by a selection of constraints.

Additional facts about the operate of the Insolvency Service, and how to complain about money misconduct.

You can also stick to the Insolvency Provider on: